Showing posts with label alexandre dumas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alexandre dumas. Show all posts

Mini-Reviews: Classics

Tuesday, April 09, 2013

Wings of the Dove by Henry James


This was my Classics Spin novel and it. was. tough. Clocking in at well over 700 pages, it was chock-full of words I had never seen before and vague sentences that required rereading in order to understand what was so faintly implied. The Wings of the Dove was my first Henry James, and it was definitely a challenge.

However, with that said, at the end of it, I felt very satisifed. I think part of that was the exhilaration of having finished my goal within about five days of making it, especially because it proved to be every bit the challenge I expected it to be. The other part of it was, I think, the fact that within that maddening subtlety of James' words lie perfect non-descriptions of the confusing, in-between non-feelings that every crazy human being experiences (except most of us are not heiresses with terminal illnesses or conniving fortune-stealers, but experience these feelings on a lower level). Savvy? 

So, in a word, not for the faint of heart, but is its own reward if you are willing to put up with re-reading sentences a few times. 

3.5 stars

Warnings: Conniving-ness

My Antonia by Willa Cather


My Antonia is a re-read for me. In eighth grade, my English teacher suggested I read it, as it was her favorite book. I remember being completely unimpressed and thinking the book was bland. However, in the last couple of years I have wondered if maybe I missed something the first time through. I am all for young people reading the classics, but I know in my case that has often resulted in my not understanding or appreciating the book the first time through. Anyway... this time I loved it. I loved the sparse prose and the simple life described in the novel, and most of all I loved that sense of first love and the power a memory has to remind you of why life is beautiful. My Antonia doesn't have the thrills and blatant romance that I would have appreciated in the eighth grade, but as an adult I can understand the graceful subtlety between its pages.

4 stars

Warnings: None

The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas pere



The Count of Monte Cristo is also a re-read for me -- but not because I under-appreciated it. It is actually one of my favorite books, and I was feeling a craving for a little adventure and romance, which this book amply supplied. I've always loved the plot, with its main focus on Edmond Dantes' meticulous revenge on the men who landed him in prison on the evening before he was married, but I am also fascinated with the subplots, particularly that of Maximilian and Valentine. I remember when I read this in high school, I thought their story was the very height of romance.

This time around, I noticed how amazingly well-written this novel is. Granted, it is a translation, but still, the power of Dumas' words shines through. Despite knowing the ending, I was just as invested on my second reading. In fact, with a few more years behind me, I think I understood the messages and themes on a deeper level. I think there is something for everyone in The Count of Monte Cristo, so go read it. Now. 

4.5 stars

Warnings: Some violence, talk of affairs

Limberlost books by Gene Stratton-Porter


Freckles and A Girl of the Limberlost, by Gene Stratton-Porter, both take place in the swamp of the Limberlost, where beautiful plants, moths, and birds abound. Set into this landscape are two charming, sweet characters. You don't need to read both books to get a complete story -- in fact, I read them in the wrong order. However, they are lovely companion novels and a few of the characters do pop up again.

Freckles is about a young, orphaned boy with only one hand who begins working in the swamp. He has no home, no family, not even a name -- but he is hard-working, positive, and has a knack for finding rare creatures. This talent leads him to meeting the Swamp Angel, whom he falls for completely and unabashedly. What follows is an adorable love story that is at times a little stickily sweet, but is nonetheless completely heartwarming.

A Girl of the Limberlost is about Elnora, a young woman in a loveless home who is determined to get an education at any cost. Faced with an unavailability of funds, she begins gathering moths to sell to collectors in order to pay for her schooling. Along the way, she discovers talents, friends, and love, both romantic and familial. Elnora's story was also engaging, although I loved Freckles a bit more. Elnora is a likable character akin to the heroines of L.M. Montgomery, who goes through plenty of "scrapes" and hard times but manages to overcome the odds at any cost. 

4 stars to both of them. :)

Warnings: none

The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas: Readalong Post II

Thursday, March 31, 2011

Guys, this is going to be another lazy-lazy post. I'm not sure exactly why, but this week is leaving me totally drained. At least the semester is almost over!

I found myself enjoying the second half of the book much more than the first half. In the first half, the Three Musketeers and D'Artagnan seemed to just be messing around, spending all their money on foolish things and picking fights. The second half of the novel seemed much more serious to me. Suddenly, they had a goal (at times tenuously defined, it is true) - they wanted to protect Madame Bonacieux, the Duke of Buckingham (well, some of them wanted to do that...) and above all, D'Artagnan. They have a defined nemesis - while they are always more or less against the cardinal, Milady is their true enemy, and it is she against whom they are fighting. Once the Musketeers had a purpose, I saw a point in their escapades. They still did stupid things, but at least they were doing something other than trying to earn money, buying horses, losing the horses through gambling, etc. (How many times did that happen?)

In this more purposeful section, I noticed a strong disparity between the Musketeers - almost as if they were cut in half and divided into two groups. On one side of the spectrum we have Aramis and Porthos. These men are comical and (more) foolish. Porthos is obsessed with women, money, and fashion. He is a bumbling, dramatic man (but does have his good points). Aramis is more serious, but also foolish because he holds so fiercely to his ideal of becoming a priest, and yet cannot stay away from women. One the other side of the divide, we have Athos and D'Artagnan - also made fools by women, it is true, but able to calculate, to plan their next advances. I really enjoyed the character of Athos, with his quiet intensity and his ability to attend to his silent servant with hand-gestures. And while D'Artagnan is young and overly passionate in this story, it's obvious that he is intelligent and brave enough to plan his own destiny.

As I glanced through that last paragraph, I realized that in different ways, the main weakness of all the Musketeers (I just automatically consider D'Artagnan as a Musketeer) involves women. Porthos needs money, and he can only get money by seducing women. Aramis believes he is called to a holy life, but keeps messing around and putting off his ordination - because of women. Athos drinks all the time because a woman ruined his life, and D'Artagnan is in agony because of the two women he falls in love with in the story. So it makes sense that the arch-nemesis of the Musketeers is a woman, Milady Clarik.

I have always said that Kathy in East of Eden by John Steinbeck was the most evil character I have ever read, but Milady could give her a run for her money. Armed with beauty, a sweet voice, and a razor sharp desire for revenge, Milady ensnares men with her charms and then leaves them to die. Even though it was horrible, I was fascinated by how carefully plotted Milady's attacks were and the way she was able to be so sure of the effect of her charms. At the same time, I was bothered that Dumas chose to portray women as the downfall of men. I really think this was a major theme of the novel. I even think Dumas quoted some proverb about women being the downfall of men... but I'm too lazy to look it up now!

To sum up... this book was a decent read, but longer than it was enjoyable. Things got better toward the end. There are multiple sequels to this novel that are waiting for me on my Kindle. I think I need a little break, but I'll be curious to see if the musketeers ever grow up. I don't think Porthos will.

The Three Musketeers by Alexandre Dumas: Readalong Post 1

Tuesday, March 15, 2011

This is the probably the book that has spent the longest amount of time on my TBR. We're talking over ten years. Like Allie, the host of this lovely challenge, I have put it off due to its length (and a slight fear that it would embark on historical monologues like The Count of Monte Cristo). In this respect, my fears have been put to rest. So far, The Three Musketeers has in many ways been the opposite of what I expected.

Like I said, no historical monologues. (Thank goodness). The book is pretty much straight-up action. Almost everything that happens is important to the plot. While at times the plot and characters get a little convoluted (for some reason, I am still really confused about who exactly Madam Chevreuse is, other than somehow connected to the queen and the paramour of Aramis), in general everything has a purpose and is interesting.

I do have to say I am a little disappointed by the flippancy of the book. I'm not sure how to explain this exactly. It is a completely biased opinion and is, I think, a direct result of my mood and not the book's merits. I was expecting a serious, gut-wrenching, poignant book. That is how I experienced The Count of Monte Cristo. The romances were rending, there was deceit and greatness and passion. This book is a little more... silly. The characters constantly pick fights and kill men for insults to their honor such as offering a fallen handkerchief with an incriminating coat-of-arms or drawing attention to the fact that one's baldric is only half golden. So many of the characters' actions were foolish.

But like I said, my mood probably influences my reaction. I have been in the mood for a heavier book, and while The Three Musketeers is heavy in weight, it is not heavy in volume. I think now that I know what to expect, I am beginning to settle in and enjoy the jokes a little more. I have really enjoyed learning the secrets of the three musketeers as d'Artagnan is getting to know them better. I do think their characters are well fleshed out and interesting, but it drives me crazy to see them do stupid things like spend all their money on wine, or gamble away their horses, or kill someone just because he looked at them cross-eyed. So far, mixed opinions of this one. I like it but I don't think it will be a favorite. Still, I'm glad that I am finally getting to it. Onward to the second half!

The Three Musketeers by Andre Dumas: Read-along Start-up Post

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

I had a great experience with A Literary Odyssey's February read-along for Oliver Twist by Charles Dickens, so I'm all aboard for the March read-along.

The Three Musketeers has been on my TBR for about thirteen years. When I was in grade school and middle school, I was known for loving to read, especially big fat books. There was a hardcover version of this book in our middle school library, and every time we went in there for a class assignment, someone in my class would pull it off the shelf and tell me that I should read it. I'm sure there were bigger books in our school library, but this one was a very large and imposing hardcover edition. I always intended to read it, but while I did end up reading The Count of Monte Cristo for a project in high school, I never got around to The Three Musketeers. After seeing Slumdog Millionaire (which I'm a little obsessed with, and which features the novel in a few key points), I knew I needed to read it and soon. So here we are. I'm a little nervous about getting in all the reading I have planned for this month (who let me sign up for all these challenges and accept all these ARCs?!?) but I am looking forward to it at the same time.

Donc, la schedule: (saying it in French. Because Alexandre Dumas is French).
15 mars - les premieres 29 chapitres
31 mars - les dernieres chapitres (j'ai oublie combien)
(I haven't spoken or written in French in about two and a half years... don't judge)

Commence swashbuckling.

Literary Blog Hop: Arrrgh

Thursday, December 09, 2010

No, it's not about pirates.

Literary Blog Hop

This week's literary blog hop, hosted by The Blue Bookcase, asks the question:

What is one of your literary pet peeves? Is there something that writers do that really sets your teeth on edge? Be specific, and give examples if you can

To be honest, I don't have a lot of literary pet peeves. There are stories that bother me, or thematic material that bothers me, but not usually literary devices that bother me, if that makes sense. Although if I see affect and effect misused, a vein in my forehead usually starts throbbing.

Probably the thing that has bothered me the most in the past is when a novel turns into a history lecture. You know, you're getting involved with the characters and the plot and loving every minute when you're suddenly thrust into an 80 page monologue about Napoleon. Which is nice, if you're wondering about Napoleon. But I'm usually not.

Don't get me wrong. I like history and I like context. I have noticed on others' posts on this topic that long descriptive passages are a common pet peeve of others. I am actually not this way - I love descriptions of settings and people and long detours into what they're thinking. But I don't like when the history goes on and on.

The two novels I've really experienced this with were Les Miserables by Victor Hugo and The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas. I really loved both of these books, so this pet peeve doesn't completely turn me off. I've even been thinking maybe I should reread those passages to increase my knowledge of history. BUT I don't think they belong right in the way of the narrative.

For some reason I can't get the blue highlighting out of the way from Christina's prompt. Oh well, consider it decorative.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...