A Study in Scarlet by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle

Monday, October 15, 2012

Title: A Study in Scarlet
Author: Sir Arthur Conan Doyle
Genre: Mystery, classic
Published: 1887, originally
Source: Personal copy
Read for: R.I.P. VII, A Classics Challenge, The Classics Club

A Study in Scarlet introduces us to Sherlock Holmes, the quirky, deducing amateur detective who can assimilate any evidence into an excellent solution. In this book he meets Dr. Watson, who like him is looking for someone to share accommodations, and drags him along to solve the mystery of a man found dead, surrounded by blood (including the German word for "Revenge" written on the wall in blood) and yet not wounded himself.

I was very excited at the beginning of A Study in Scarlet. In the past I have only read short stories about Sherlock Holmes, and I loved the increased level of detail and depth in the story. I also loved getting to see more of the background behind Sherlock and Watson's relationship. Watson's first impressions of Sherlock were priceless, as were the details of Watson getting used to living with someone of Sherlock's odd and enigmatic personality.

Things became a little odd when the story reverted to the background behind the crime, otherwise known as the "Mormon" section. Reading the book as if it were just a fiction, it was interesting enough, but it was difficult for me to ignore the glaring errors and generalizations made about my religion. The story in and of itself was enjoyable, but do bear in mind that the story is meant to be thrilling, and that great liberties are taken with the historical facts. I'm not going to go through the whole book and point out all the untrue details because this is a book review, but if you have questions feel free to email me (my contact info is on the About Me page).

Other than the irritation there, the characters were delightful and the story held my interest. It is a short novella, easily read in a few hours, but it held more depth than the shorter Sherlock stories I have enjoyed in the past. It was exciting to be introduced to Sherlock and Watson and get background on their relationship. It definitely has me ready to read more of the longer Sherlock Holmes stories.

3.5 stars

Warnings: Violence

8 comments:

  1. If you haven't read the Valley of Fear, I strongly recommend that. It's dark, much darker than Study in Scarlet, and arguably, darker even than the Hound of the Baskerville.

    If you'd be so kind as to give me the facts about Mormons, please send me email or DM me at my twitter @museforsaken.

    Thanks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the recommendation! I will send you in an email in a few minutes.

      Delete
  2. I'm 50 pages into this one and just think it's a little boring. I hope that doesn't show that I have a short attention span. I don't think it does! I'm not sure I'll read the others in the series after this. Hmm.. Will be back to read the review in full when I've completed it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I really liked it most of all I think because it reminded me of the BBC show, which while setting Sherlock in modern times still does a really good job of paying attention to the details. It definitely can move slowly, though!

      Delete
  3. I really enjoyed this one, too - though you are right that you have to take the "Mormon section" with a grain of salt, as it is definitely not factual. I was surprised that Doyle wrote about Mormons in Utah at all, really; I guess I didn't think that was a top-of-mind topic for British authors in his time?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I was really surprised as well. There were quite a few Mormon missionaries in Britain at the time and there were some British people who immigrated to America to make the trip to Salt Lake, so I would imagine that is maybe where he got it, but it's hard to know for sure.

      Delete
  4. I haven't read Doyle yet, but I'd heard this was the place to start. Also, I was given warning about the "Mormon" section too... and now I kind of want to see how erroneous it is! -Sarah

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In some ways it was kind of amusing how erroneous it was -- except I'd hate for people to think that was the reality of the religion. Still, overall a very interesting book!

      Delete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...