Physics of the Future by Michio Kaku

Monday, March 26, 2012

Title: Physics of the Future
Author: Michio Kaku
Genre: Nonfiction, science
Publisher: Doubleday, 2011
Source: Library
Read for: Indie Lit Awards

This is going to be a quick review because life is insane, but I am drastically behind in my reviews -- I have enough to make it to May without reading another book. So here goes. :)

Michio Kaku's book has an interesting premise: Take several different technologies, such as medicine, economics, robotics, computers, and nanotechnology, and evaluate what they will be like in 2030, 2050, and 2100.

Sounds cool, right? In many ways, it was. I was introduced to countless inventions and possibilites that had never crossed my mind, and the fact that when I was in elementary school, I still had never used the internet, had a cell phone, or heard of a blog show that drastic changes are certainly possible, considering that all of these things factor very significantly into my daily life. However, Kaku did not convince me that all of these inventions are in our future. He had an arrogant tone, saying that these inventions will definitely be a part of our future lives, while citing examples of others who had said the same thing about certain technologies we have yet to see. It seemed to me as if every time he was describing something especially revolutionary he would say, "You think that this won't happen -- but it will." I needed a little more evidence to back up those claims -- the "look how far we've come lately" argument isn't quite solid enough to convince me. Many of these claims were quite extremist -- for example, Kaku claimed that physicians would be completely outdated by the year 2100, and that nanobots would scour our bodies for rogue cells and microorganisms while a computer analyzed them and prescribed treatment according to an algorithm. While nanobots rooting out cancer sounds like an excellent idea to me, I don't think an algorithm will ever completely effective in prescribing and diagnosing. Each human body is so different, and each illness somewhat unique in its way -- I think there will always be a human behind the nanobot.

I also found Kaku's writing to be somewhat lacking. Of course, his primary goal was to convey information from his primary career, science. However, I think if someone endeavors to write a book, they owe it to their reader to write well -- writing not being their primary career is not an excuse. While Kaku's ideas were conveyed clearly enough, at times transitions or explanations were a bit awkward or simplistic, brimming with enthusiasm but not always content.

However, there were some interesting ideas. As mentioned before, I love the idea of nanobots living in our bodies and destroying rogue cells that could lead to cancer. I also found Kaku's ideas on information being inserted in a chip or some other internal device for constant access to be refreshing -- I usually feel pretty fatalistic about biotechnological enhancement, but he painted the picture much more brightly than I had perceived it.

Physics of the Future will appeal to technology and science buffs and futurists, but Kaku's claims must be taken with a grain of salt. He is eager to state that his ideas are the certain truth, which gave the entire book an air of incredulity. It is an interesting but flawed book.

3 stars

Warnings: None I can think of


  1. That's kind of freaky. It does make you wonder what will really happen in the future, though.

    1. Yes, it definitely made me consider some possibilities I had never thought of before.

  2. Oohhh this sounds interesting!

    This guy has written a lot of books that I've wanted to try reading, but I was worried about the readability factor, seeing as how he's all science-y. It sounds like he was pretty easy to understand though, even if the writing wasn't the best. I think I'll give it a try!

    Thanks for the review!

    1. I think he was pretty readable, and explained everything he was talking about.

  3. Great review! I always wonder about seemingly-wild claims on technology. In many ways, I think it is difficult to back up those claims - how can one really "prove" that robots will be physicians in 100 years? But at the same time, it's just very difficult to believe just how different life will be for us as we get older. I always think this when I look back at the past few generations - in particular, people who were born at the end of the Victorian era and then died in the 1970s or so- such a MASSIVE amount of change occurred in their lives. Not only was the automobile invented, but people went to the moon!

    1. That is a good point -- the internet, astronauts, everything would seem so insane to people who lived 100 years ago. The author just seemed so sure of himself and I wanted to shake him and say, "No! You can't predict the future!" But maybe I am just not ready for change.


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...